Enough unlawful court cases that never see the light of day.
Internet Inventor never sees a lawful or public trial.
Dorothy M. Hartman who is the only Internet Inventor with claims to the Internet that are backed by evidence , documents , and potential witnesses says that she continues to suffer from the absence of law in endless court cases where lack of due process is continuously applied . Although corporately owned main stream media continues to black out her story in the press – nevertheless we have known since the Federal Appeals Court ruling in 2013 of this woman’s fight for justice . That opinion although not widely known has been published 13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1 in which the Court basically affirmed the decision by the Patent Office not to grant a patent .
Hartman alleges that she has never desired to ‘rule over the Internet’. ” I am its inventor and only I know or have known the scope of it and the entire idea is not feasible because of the greatness of it – although I do not agree that it is not patentenable because it represents a transformation from the original and it is attached to the use of machinery and therefore is not indefinite . As for not being in one or two sentences – that could have been remedied had I been given the opportunity to edit my claims which I was not . As a matter of fact my original claims were illegally removed by the Patent Office . It was never intended which is clear in my original proposals and writings that any one person or thing should rule over the Internet . It was always meant to be for businesses and ordinary consumers which was the intent of my writings Inventor’s Proposal in 1990 to change Telecom.
The purpose of filing for a patent was that it was the only way to reserve my legal rights as I had tried since 1990 to work within the system – but have been completely mistreated and denied . It is not bad enough apparently that they rob me of billions of dollars worth of intellectual property that is mine – without so much as a nod in acknowledgment and compensation but they have abused me with the takeover and the illegal seizure of my personal property purchased with a life time of work which is an abuse of law .
Where is the law when it comes to the rights of African-Americans ? Where is integrity and judgment ? How do you distinguish between the lawful and the criminal in what is being accepted as supposedly rulings by a court . Hartman alleges that the numerous court cases in which she has become involved do not pass the legal smell test not only because she alleges to be at the very least one of the inventors of what is one of the greatest inventions in the world – but because she has dared to try and fight back against the perpetrators who unfortunately are led by government . Their crimes against us acceptable since they are being carried out against Blacks , who are apparently according to their superciliousness less than human beings .
Her home which was recently confiscated and sold at Sheriff’s Sale back in June 2016 after being vandalized . She alleges was a result of a Civil Conspiracy among the Courts in Pennsylvania to deny her civil and constitutional rights as none of them would hear an appeal on the matter . She alleges in retaliation to her speaking truth to power and the abuse of that power against the rights of African-AmericansInventor’s home vandalized . “Blatant perjury , and out an out lies as shown by the Record of the court case(s) were profusely used to allow a Kangaroo Court in State Court to confiscate my home when I had been paying my mortgage by automatic deduction from my bank account and had a 705 credit rating .”
The Bank of New York Mellon in a fraudulent scheme that was clearly not a legal In Rem foreclosure but had been manipulated by the Bank of America which previously had denied me a refinance at the time when higher interest rates were being lowered because of actions by the federal government . I filed a complaint against the Bank with the Comptroller of the Currency . There was collusion between the bank(s) and the City of Philadelphia which used negative Court Reporting to libel my name and reputation to set up the illegal take away of my home .
When they filed the illegal mortgage foreclosure in the Court of Common Pleas , Hartman filed her case in federal court hoping that her rights would be protected . However what she alleges was an activist judge , Paul S. Diamond ruled on ethnicity to protect his political interests . The perpetrators who consisted of racist realtors with whom she had to contend from the time she bought real estate in a historic part of Philadelphia and their cronies within city government participating in’pay to play’ schemes in real estate corruption were allowed to get away with their attack on her home and automobiles. This is an abuse of the law . Where is evidentiary law ? Since the nation watched Rodney King be beaten within an inch of his life with so many in the population denying what their own senses saw and detected there is a tendency at least by the Justice System to overlook evidence when dealing with rights concerning Blacks .
An activist judge in Philadelphia who was supposed to administrate the matter in Federal Court which was the proper court of jurisdiction because of the violations of both her civil and constitutional rights by these powerful agencies and which she had reported to federal agencies like the Office of Thrift Supervision , Comptroller of the Currency and Hud completely ignored evidence of federal questions . The judge remanded what the inventor alleges is a phony foreclosure case back to State Court which was the wrong court of jurisdiction so as to force through an illegal mortgage foreclosure that had been manipulated by the power brokers themselves. The inventor alleges that this was an abuse of law .
It was clearly predatory and fraudulent
but it was forced through State Court as a mortgage foreclosure and the sheriff sale held shortly after . Every Pennsylvania Court denied an appeal on the matter . Although the inventor immediately appealed the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court , thus far , the case has not been docketed. The illegal sale occurred in June 2016 and she had filed her objections and appeal to the Supreme Court in July 2016 within the allotted time for an appeal . What is happening with evidence and the law ? Especially when it comes to abuse of the law in cases involving black Americans ? Violations of Federal Rules of Evidence are serious jurisprudence infractions – yet this is not the least of failures in Due Process experienced by the Inventor .
The obvious lack of due process which was allowed by a federal judge – holding the hearing in the wrong court of jurisdiction and further on the date of the hearing the case was moved from the civil court judge to a criminal court judge .” Yet it was the perpetrators who attacked me not me attacking them . They vandalized my automobiles and my house creating an $8,000 interruption in my income which caused me to miss approximately 3 months on my mortgage payments . The trashing and the vandalism done by a convicted felon known by the perpetrators and which the city of Philadelphia refused to lock up or even allow me to file charges against him .
Where is the law when it comes to the rights of African – Americans ?
Within 3 months when the arrears on my mortgage were approximately $7100 I appealed to the Bank of America to allow me the opportunity to repair the default – which the bank refused to do opting instead in its collusion with negative Court Reporting by the City of Philadelphia deliberately libeling me and defaming my character to set up an illegal seizure of my home .
Because I had spoken up about the abuses and even participated in the research done by the Committee for Racial and Gender Bias in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I had filed charges against city VIP’s for fraud and discrimination in the case of Dorothy Hartman vs. Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association – Dennis Milstein – so I was set up for Retaliation – an illegal set up to take my house without any appeals a part of that persecution . Federal Rules of Evidence repeatedly ignored in court cases and violations in Due Process are the norm rather than exception in the proceedings .
“Further how dare I a Negress to allege contribution to what has become their precious Internet after stealing my ideas in 1990Inventor’s Proposal in 1990 to change Telecom . I am being facetious of course but not really, ” says inventor,” because that and those who consider themselves above the law lies at the core of it all” . The perpetrators were all dismissed by the Federal Judge Paul S. Diamond real lawyer’s judge ? dropped the case in federal court . Dropping the case on a 16- page order issued just as the Banks had been issued summons and were supposed to appear in Court and answer the charges , throwing out and disregarding evidence of federal questions , and potential witnesses but allowing the illegal confiscation of her home for damages of $331,999.95 . The Inventor alleges that these acts by the perpetrators were illegal – and that even those taken by the Court were outside of legal jurisprudence within the U.S. and cry out for justice . The Court(s) have prevented her from legal representation by libel and defamation while allowing blatant abuse of due process. Not only has she been stripped of her property rights but apparently her rights as a citizen and human being .
Where is the law
She is asking the Supreme Court of the United States to review this case .
You can view the cases online at Pacer.Gov. Pacer is available to anyone for a small fee ( fee is charged according to the number of documents one views ) – you may view the cases online . The State Case is in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia and the Case number is 120202759 in which the Bank of New York Mellon et al vs. Dorothy Hartman . Dorothy Hartman vs. Bank of New York Mellon et al and in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No.3157 EDA 2015 The other Case is 2:13-cv-01909, Dorothy Hartman vs. Bank of New York Mellon et al in the District or Federal Court in Eastern Pa. located in Philadelphia .The Inventor is appealed the matter in the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit , Case No. 15-1318 , which denied Appeal but granted Summary Judgment in favor of the banks .